| 1) by JakeElwood [06/5/07 10:59:39 AM] |
pretty badass - at last there's a use for all thos
e 1000s of redundant photos of tourist destination
s
|
| |
| 2) by AbelDork [06/5/07 12:27:29 PM] |
lol yeah |
| |
| 3) by Boshy [06/7/07 03:51:43 AM] |
now that's impressive... |
| |
| 4) by digital photographer [06/15/07 03:06:37 AM] |
very impressive! |
| |
| 5) by ajballa [06/27/07 07:59:12 PM] |
thats fuckin ridiculous |
| |
| 6) by XxDefaultxX [07/14/07 12:11:50 AM] |
i know ur fuckin with the hockey video well now i
fuk with urs
|
| |
| 7) by Malomarmoset [09/2/07 07:29:16 PM] |
Wow, just a few years after Google Earth MS invent
s the tech.
|
| |
| 8) by Unreg * [09/24/07 03:12:41 AM] |
and this is different to Google Earth by ........
?
|
| |
| 9) by Njaa * [09/26/07 05:04:21 AM] |
How is this even similar to Google Earth? Why woul
d you say that?
|
| |
| 10) by Pathetic [Unreg.] * [09/26/07 11:35:05 AM] |
Useless technology that looks pretty.
Technology
that zooms in pictures?! WOW I NEVER THOUGHT OF TH
AT! Disregard that you'll need about 20Gbs of RAM
to do it.
What a joke.
|
| |
| 11) by SorosCrew * [10/7/07 10:36:54 PM] |
GoogleEarth? You actually can not see how differen
t and what an amazing leap beyong Google Earth thi
s is?.... That's like comparing the maps that they
give out at AAA to Google Earth and asking what t
he difference is. Wow!! And "useless technolo
gy"? What rock are you people hiding under. W
hat that man just showed you has far reaching impl
ication than just a cool way to look up your house
or your vacation photos from the lake last summer
. For the rest of us that see what these guys are
unlocking I say WOW!!!! I look forward to seeing w
here this insight and jump in technology has taken
us in 5 years.
|
| |
| 12) by Doandaug Fresh * [10/8/07 11:03:37 AM] |
it's not useless atall...we'll have to think of so
mething to do with it but no doubt it will be very
handy. OK you're prob right about need 20gb of RA
M to run it but hey, noone even knew what a gigaby
te was, like 5 years ago. Now cellphones are comin
g with gigs of memory as standard.
|
| |
| 13) by [`bajun] * [10/13/07 10:45:45 PM] |
"Wow, just a few years after Google Earth MS
invents the tech."
I think you misspelled
"acquired."
MS never invents anything..
. and this, not surprisingly, is no exception. The
y just bought it from someone else.
|
| |
| 14) by diffrent[Unreg.] * [10/31/07 11:38:07 AM] |
It's a totally new technology. The guy searched Fl
ickr for "Notre Dame" and the program CR
EATED a 3D image of the church by composing the p
ictures that referred to Notre Dame. It took 2D pi
ctures taken from hundreds or thousands of angles
with DSLRs or phone cameras and it created a virtu
al image. One can navigate through the virtual 3D
image composed from pictures taken with diffrent p
urposes. Nevertheless, the program identified all
the angles the pictures were taken from. It's amaz
ing. No comparison with... anything!
|
| |
| 15) by jameswwww * [10/31/07 11:17:06 PM] |
the stuff at the end is OLD!!! |
| |
| 16) by zado * [11/1/07 10:25:57 AM] |
|
| |
| 17) by PCboy * [11/15/07 09:07:13 PM] |
It's important to talk really fast when describing
new technology...otherwise simple people might un
derstand what you're saying and point their icky f
ingers at you!
|
| |
| 18) by Scrump * [11/21/07 10:39:52 PM] |
To put it simple for all of you haters. If micros
oft aquired them they must have something worth a
damn! Impressive!
|
| |
| 19) by duh * [11/28/07 09:46:20 PM] |
It doesn't matter how cool, useful, or revolutiona
ry this is. According to the law of the internet,
anything made by Microsoft is inferior.
|
| |
| 20) by [unreg]flameheadxl * [12/12/07 07:10:32 AM] |
do u understand how the military will use this??? |
| |
| 21) by yello * [12/14/07 03:53:04 PM] |
20GB of RAM? I don't think so. I'm pretty sure wha
t makes seadragon revolutionary is not need that,
being able to handle it using current day technolo
gy
|
| |
| 22) by Unreg * [01/6/08 10:49:42 PM] |
It doesn't matter how cool, useful, or revolutiona
ry this is. According to the law of the internet,
anything made by Microsoft is inferior???
Do yo
u understand how damaging this statement to your p
ersona did? Makes you an unreasonable fanboy. Yo
ur statement didn't hurt microsoft at all...but it
did your kind.
I'm sure you'd be so screaming
like a 17 year old girl if this was made by Apple
or somebody else.
Tsk tsk....some people.
|
| |
| 23) by GetGlad [01/14/08 04:14:11 AM] |
oh yeah and they expect that to run on vista? haha |
| |
| 24) by xidarian * [01/27/08 06:04:28 PM] |
looks kinda like google earth, but google earth is
n't new! this is shit, google has been doing this
and microsoft is gay
|
| |
| 25) by xidarian * [01/27/08 06:04:44 PM] |
looks kinda like google earth, but google earth is
n't new! this is shit, google has been doing this
and microsoft is gay
|
| |
| 26) by the internets * [01/31/08 12:22:59 AM] |
is for morons.
The capabilities presented have
implications far exceeding the width and breath of
this display.
I like the idea of "turtle
s all the way down". The user interface would
be astounding; the intercontextualization of data
in such a manner would serve as an incredible lea
rning tool. The regression may not be infinite, bu
t it is a damned good start.
Great user interfa
ces allow for quicker, more accurate access to dat
a. For some people, this is the purpose of virtual
environments. For others it's porn, three hundred
spoofs and pretend communities. For everyone els
e, this is a godsend.
|
| |
| 27) by [Unreg.] * [01/31/08 04:01:02 PM] |
Wow, use it for porn. I love that idea!!!
Serio
usly though, this is bloody amazing, and the uses
are endless. Comparing to Google Earth?? Nothing l
ike it, nothing. This has far greater potential.
|
| |
| 28) by SiLvEr * [02/10/08 11:27:20 AM] |
you can chec out the tehnologie at http://labs.liv
e.com/photosynth/view you will figure out that it
does not need 20g I have 640mb of RAM and it works
just fine.. 1gb is optimum..
Tehnologie is gre
at and it has much more then any of you even menti
oned.. metadata?
|
| |
| 29) by budongo [03/28/08 05:14:14 PM] |
Looks to me like it was made by simply ripping off
Jef Raskin's "Zooming User Interface" o
r ZUI. C dragon? No this is ZUI...
See what I m
ean here...
Raskin's ZUI demo:
http://rchi.raski
ncenter.org/demos/zoomdemo.swf
More about Jef R
askin here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jef_Rask
in
So many people cannot think of original idea
s so they just steal.
|
| |
| 30) by Konz * [05/1/08 06:34:38 AM] |
why should it need 20 gb ram?
the site says its j
ust 1 gb.
and it looks very impressive
|
| |
| 31) by . * [05/22/08 04:02:22 AM] |
>Wow, just a few years after Google Earth MS in
vents the tech.
>So many people cannot think
of original ideas so they just steal.
It follo
ws the same idea, but it doesn't stop at simply re
implementing those other examples you close-minded
douchebags have pointed out, it's more than just
zooming in and out real fast. I say being able to
generate spatial and 3-D models entirely out of pi
ctures is very impressive, but you probably trolle
d too early to notice that.
Unless you've alway
s been living under the rock of fanboyism, Microso
ft actually sponsors college competitions to encou
rage students to come up with and demonstrate prom
ising new technologies. It's not much different fr
om Google's Summer of Code.
|
| |
| 32) by ReX * [05/23/08 09:41:39 AM] |
What's Google Earth got to do with this technology
?
There's a zoom option in both?
Morons
.
Wait! Maybe Google Earth stole the Idea from
windows 3.11 "Paint" software!
|
| |
| 33) by Computer Genius * [09/14/08 11:14:01 PM] |
Could someone please tell me how do I turn off my
computer?
|
| |
| 34) by Kyle * [10/27/08 01:11:13 AM] |
Get me some fractals and I'll fall in love |
| |
| 35) by Anon * [12/7/08 02:21:40 AM] |
Google earth= A bunch of satellite images being la
yered over a 3D sphere to create a map.
This=A
bunch of images you can search the internet for to
create a 3D model and environment.
Also he CLE
ARLY explains why you will NOT need to have 20GB o
f ram because seadragon only renders the pixels on
the screen that you will need. It uses less memor
y than photoshop. Not to mention even if it did us
e a large amount of ram, by the time it was finish
ed the hardware will have easily caught up with th
e software.
Do people seriously go on the inter
net and pretend to know things?
|
| |
| 36) by joe * [12/12/08 01:30:23 PM] |
Wow. Bricks shat. |
| |
